home | search | email list | feedback | submit a quote

Escape From Reason
(1968)

Summary

"Every generation of Christians has this problem of learning how to speak meaningfully to its own age. It cannot be solved without an understanding of the changing existential situation which it faces. If we are to communicate the Christian faith effectively, therefore, we must know and understand the thought forms of our own generation. These will differ slightly from place to place, and more so from nation to nation. Nevertheless there are characteristics of an age such as ours which are the same wherever we happen to be. It is these that I am especially considering in this book. And the object of this is far from being merely to satisfy intellectual curiosity. As we go along, it will become clear how far-reaching are the practical consequences of a proper understanding of these movements of thought."
(Francis A. Schaeffer, Escape From Reason, Introduction)



Commercial Availability of Work

Escape From Reason (paper)
Trilogy (hard - 367 pages)
The Complete Works of Francis Schaeffer (paper)
The Complete Works of Francis Schaeffer (Windows CDROM)

 

Book Reviews


Review by W. Simpson at Logos Word Review



Quotes From The Book


There were very good things that resulted from the birth of Renaissance thought. In particular, nature received a more proper place. From a biblical viewpoint nature is important because it has been created by God, and is not to be despised. The things of the body are not to be despised when compared with the soul. The things of beauty are important. Sexual things are not evil of themselves. All these things follow from the fact that in nature God has given us a good gift, and the man who regards it with contempt is really despising Godís creation. As such he is despising, in a sense, God Himself, for he has contempt for what God has made.
(Francis A. Schaeffer, Escape From Reason, Ch. 1)



Today we have a weakness in our educational process in failing to understand the natural associations between the disciplines. We tend to study all our disciplines in unrelated parallel lines. This tends to be true in both Christian and secular education. This is one of the reasons why evangelical Christians have been taken by surprise at the tremendous shift that has come in our generation. We have studied our exegesis as exegesis, our theology as theology, our philosophy as philosophy; we study something about art as art; we study music as music, without understanding that these are things of man, and the things of man are never unrelated parallel lines.
(Francis A. Schaeffer, Escape From Reason, Ch. 1)

 


It is an important principle to remember, in the contemporary interest in communication and in language study, that the biblical presentation is that though we do not have exhaustive truth, we have from the Bible what I term true truth. In this way we know true truth about God, true truth about man, and something truly about nature. Thus on the basis of the Scriptures, while we do not have exhaustive knowledge, we have true and unified knowledge.
(Francis A. Schaeffer, Escape From Reason, Ch. 2)



We cannot deal with people like human beings, we cannot deal with them on the high level of true humanity, unless we really know their origin -- who they are. God tells man who he is. God tells us that He created man in His image. So man is something wonderful.
(Francis A. Schaeffer, Escape From Reason, Ch. 2)



The Bible says that you are wonderful because you are made in the image of God, but that you are flawed because at a space-time point of history man fell. The reformers knew that man was separated from God because of manís revolt against God. But the reformers, and the people who following the Reformation built the culture of Northern Europe, knew that while man is morally guilty before the God who exists, man is not nothing. Modern man tends to think that he is nothing. The reformers knew they were the very opposite of nothing, because they knew they were made in the image of God. Even though they were fallen and, without the nonhumanistic solution of Christ and His substitutionary death, were separated from God and would go to Hell, this still did not mean that they were nothing.
(Francis A. Schaeffer, Escape From Reason, Ch. 2)



...whenever art or science has tried to be autonomous, a principle has always manifested itself -- nature eats up grace. Thus art and science themselves soon began to be meaningless.
(Francis A. Schaeffer, Escape From Reason, Ch. 2)



People today are trying to hang on to the dignity of man, but they do not know how to, because they have lost the truth that man is made in the image of God. Adam was an unprogrammed man, a significant man in a significant history, and he could change history.
(Francis A. Schaeffer, Escape From Reason, Ch. 2)



We need to learn that when we begin to tamper with the scriptural concept of true moral guilt, whether it be psychological tampering, genetic tampering, theological tampering or any other kind of tampering, our view of what Jesus did will no longer be scriptural. Christ died for man who had true moral guilt because man had made a real and true choice.
(Francis A. Schaeffer, Escape From Reason, Ch. 2)



The sobering fact is that the only way one can reject thinking in terms of an antithesis and the rational is on the basis of the rational and the antithesis. When a man says that thinking in terms of an antithesis is wrong, what he is really doing is using the concept of antithesis to deny antithesis. That is the way God has made us, and there is no other way to think.
(Francis A. Schaeffer, Escape From Reason, Ch. 3)



The early scientists believed in the uniformity of natural causes. What they did not believe in was the uniformity of natural causes in a closed system. That little phrase makes all the difference in the world. It makes the difference between natural science and a science that is rooted in naturalistic philosophy. It makes all the difference between what I would call modern science and what I would call modern modern science. It is important to notice that this is not a failing of science as science, but rather that the uniformity of natural causes in a closed system has become the dominant philosophy among scientists.
(Francis A. Schaeffer, Escape From Reason, Ch. 3)



The result of seeking for a unity on the basis of the uniformity of natural causes in a closed system is that freedom does not exist. In fact, love no longer exists; significance, in the old sense of man's longing for significance, no longer exists.
(Francis A. Schaeffer, Escape From Reason, Ch. 3)



The twentieth-century pornographic writers all trace their origin to the Marquis de Sade (1740-1814). The twentieth century now treats him as a very important man -- he is no longer just a dirty writer. A generation ago, if anyone was found with one of his books in England he was liable to have difficulties with the law. Today he has become a great name in drama, in philosophy, in literature. All the nihilistic black writers, the writers in revolt, look back to de Sade. Why? Not only because he was a dirty writer, or even that he has taught them how to use sexual writing as a vehicle for philosophic ideas, but also basically he was a chemical determinist. He understood the direction that things would have to take when man is included in the machinery. The conclusions he drew were these: if man is determined, then what is, is right. If all of life is only mechanism -- if that is all there is -- then morals really do not count. Morals become only a word for a sociological framework. Morals become a means of manipulation by society in the midst of the machine. The word morals by this time is only a semantic connotation word for nonmorals. What is, is right.
(Francis A. Schaeffer, Escape From Reason, Ch. 3)



We are watching our culture put into effect the fact that when you tell men long enough that they are machines, it soon begins to show in their actions. You see it in our whole culture -- in the theatre of cruelty, in the violence in the streets, in the death of man in art and life.
(Francis A. Schaeffer, Escape From Reason, Ch. 3)



The basic position of man in rebellion against God is that man is at the center of the universe, that he is autonomous -- here lies his rebellion. Man will keep his rationalism and his rebellion, his insistence on total autonomy or partially autonomous areas, even if it means he must give up his rationality.
(Francis A. Schaeffer, Escape From Reason, Ch. 3)


© 1999 Rational Pi, all rights reserved